Empowering Patients Through Clinical Accuracy3

Patients aren’t just surviving, they’re thriving. The CAM Patch delivers clarity and confidence when it matters most.

Real Patients, Real Impact

Richard’s Story

“The CAM Patch gave me answers no other monitor could. It showed my doctors a 2:1 Atrial Flutter diagnosis missed before, and I was in the lab for an ablation two weeks later. Now, I’m back to hiking, not just hoping.”

– Richard W.

Clinical Summary

Previous Monitor Result: Inconclusive SVT
CAM Patch Finding: 2:1 Atrial Flutter
Treatment: Ablation within 2 weeks
Outcome: Symptom-free return to activity

SVT to Specific Diagnosis

Lauryn’s Story

“The CAM Patch gave me a real name for my arrhythmia. That name gave me my life back.

– Lauryn C.

Clinical Summary

Previous Monitor Result: 10+ external monitors and 2 ILRs failed to identify a specific arrhythmia. Diagnosed only with vague SVT despite years of symptoms
CAM Patch Finding: Clear detection of a specific atrial arrhythmia (AVRT) via high-resolution, P-wave centric analysis.
Treatment: Underwent an EP study followed by successful ablation based on CAM findings.
Outcome: No recurrence of symptoms post-ablation. Returned to a normal life free of unexpected episodes.

ECG Reports that Provide Answers

Patients Deserve Specificity… and So Do You

Whether it’s an AFL to AF transition, an abnormal PAC burden, or a run of AT, the CAM Patch’s signal clarity delivers the context and precision your patients deserve and the evidence your team can trust.1,2,3

Detect 50+ Arrhythmia and Ectopic beats 1

Provides Your team With Clarity and Specificity 3

Delivers Reports You Can Trust 1

Discover how the CAM Patch Can Help Your Patients

Empower Your Patients Through Confident ECG Analysis

Let’s Get Started

Whether you’re exploring the CAM Patch for the first time or looking to bring it to your clinical team, we’re here to help.

The Carnation Ambulatory Monitor is intended for ambulatory collection of ECG data. Rx Only. For safe and proper use of the products mentioned herein, please refer to the Instructions for Use.
Reference
  1. Data on file
  2. Smith WM, Riddell F, Madon M, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours. Am Heart J 2017; 185:67-73.
  3. Rho R, Vossler M, Blancher S, Poole JE. Comparison of two ambulatory patch ECG monitors: The benefit of the P-wave and the signal clarity. Am Heart J 2018; 203:109-117.
  4. Willcox M, Compton S, Bardy G. Continuous ECG monitoring versus mobile telemetry: A comparison of arrhythmia diagnostics in human- versus algorithmic-dependent systems. Heart Rhythm O2, 2021; 2:6:543-559.

US-FLC199-250116 (v1.0) 08/2025