CAM Patch

See why the CAM Patch will elevate your patient care through diagnostic accuracy and actionable data.2,3

Why CAM Patch

Clear Data. Real Clinical Outcomes.

The CAM Patch helps physicians and healthcare providers identify clinically significant arrhythmias with clarity, leading to actionable diagnoses, clinical outcomes, and confidence in care decisions.1,2

Not All Cardiac Monitors Are Created Equal

Clinical Studies show that the CAM Patch detects more clinically actionable information than traditional Holter monitors, Zio Patch, or MCT devices. With clear P-wave detection and clear ECG tracings, the CAM Patch delivers the precision your team needs to act quickly and confidently1,2,3

CAM vs. Holter

CAM vs.
Holter

3.8x

more patients presented clinically significant information than Holter (p<0.001) 1

CAM vs.Zio

CAM vs.
Zio

41%

of CAM vs Zio Patch cases would have led to difference decisions 2

CAM vs. MCT

CAM vs.
MCT

2x

more patients were diagnosed with arrhythmias detected
vs. MCT 3

Enhanced CAM Reports

Built for Diagnostic Accuracy

The CAM Report is powered by low-noise floor and P-wave centric technology, giving you a full view of atrial activity – including transitions between AFL, AT, and AF.

Highlights:

  • Full ECG analysis summary
  • Inventory of arrhythmias at a glance
  • 1-minute HR variability trends
  • Clear strip labeling and symptom correlation
  • 40-minute interval plots for key events

From Uncertainty to Confidence

CAM‘s ability to capture the elusive P-wave changed my life. I finally had a diagnosis that explained everything.

– Richard Wood, CAM Patch Patient

Ready to See the CAM Patch Difference?

Let’s Get Started

Whether you’re exploring the CAM Patch for the first time or looking to bring it to your clinical team, we’re here to help.

The Carnation Ambulatory Monitor is intended for ambulatory collection of ECG data. Rx Only. For safe and proper use of the products mentioned herein, please refer to the Instructions for Use.
Reference
  1. Smith WM, Riddell F, Madon M, et al. Comparison of diagnostic value using a small, single channel, P-wave centric sternal ECG monitoring patch with a standard 3-lead Holter system over 24 hours. Am Heart J 2017; 185:67-73.
  2. Rho R, Vossler M, Blancher S, Poole JE. Comparison of two ambulatory patch ECG monitors: The benefit of the P-wave and the signal clarity. Am Heart J 2018; 203:109-117.
  3. Willcox M, Compton S, Bardy G. Continuous ECG monitoring versus mobile telemetry: A comparison of arrhythmia diagnostics in human- versus algorithmic-dependent systems. Heart Rhythm O2, 2021; 2:6:543-559.

US-FLC199-250114 (v1.0) 08/2025